Find out how to tackle one of the biggest challenges in treating cancer with Genomic testing for cancer treatment Read more

EndoPredict Breast Cancer Prognostic Test

 

Prof. Dr. med. Michael Untch, Head of Clinic for Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Obstetrics, Head of Breast Interdisciplinary Cancer Center Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HELIOS Clinic Berlin-Buch in Berlin, Germany

Watch Prof. Untch’s case
study

  • 50 years old, postmenopausal, pT2, N1, G2, L0, V0, R0, ER 30/80%, PR 100/90%, Ki67 10%, lobular
    early-stage breast cancer patient
  • Poll of other clinicians’ case opinions
  • How her EndoPredict result changed the treatment decision
  • Clinical validation of the test in this patient group

Get more case studies

Get in touch

Clear results

Informed conversations

Confident decisions

Get clear results

     Based on her individualized risk score. See her full report

9%

risk of distant recurrence within 10 years

3%

absolute individualized chemotherapy benefit

7%

5–15 year late distant recurrence risk*
*with 5 years of endocrine therapy alone

Have informed conversations

   Simple to interpret, straightforward to explain. For example:

“Your result gave you a low-risk score”

“This is based on the activity of your genes and tumor
risk profile”

“There is a 91% probability your cancer will not return
within 10 years”

“Chemotherapy reduces this risk by 3%, but this small benefit may not outweigh the potential for side effects”

Make confident decisions

   Knowing her result
  • Is from the most accurate prognostic1 and predictive test2

    •  

  • Combines her clinical factors with a molecular gene expression score3-5
  • Is clinically validated and prospectively confirmed2-10

 

  • Is recommended by international guidelines11-14

What this meant for this patient

Based on her clear result, this patient and her clinician decided to proceed without chemotherapy, allowing her to avoid the potential side effects.

Her report breakdown

    Other case studies

    Sign up to receive more case studies and discover how EndoPredict guides chemotherapy decisions
    in other clinical scenarios. Includes access to the full webinar, with Q&A and prospective data.

    References

    1. Sestak, Ivana et al. “Comparison Of The Performance of 6 Prognostic Signatures For Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.” JAMA Oncology, vol 4, no. 4, 2018, pp. 545–553
    2. Sestak, Ivana et al. “Prediction of chemotherapy benefit by EndoPredict in patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy or endocrine therapy alone.” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 176, 2019, pp. 377–386.
    3. Filipits, Martin et al. “Prediction of Distant Recurrence Using EndoPredict Among Women with ER+, HER2− Node-Positive and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Treated with Endocrine Therapy Only.” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 25, no. 13, 2019, pp. 3865–3872.
    4. Filipits, Martin et al. “A New Molecular Predictor of Distant Recurrence in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Adds Independent Information to Conventional Clinical Risk Factors.” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 17, no. 18, 2011, pp. 6012–6020.
    5. Dubsky, Peter et al. “The EndoPredict Score Provides Prognostic Information On Late Distant Metastases In ER+/HER2− Breast Cancer Patients.” British Journal Of Cancer, vol. 109, no. 12, 2013, pp. 2959–2964.
    6. Buus, Richard et al. “Comparison of EndoPredict and EPclin With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 108, no. 11, 2016, p.149.
    7. Martín, Miguel et al. “Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide (FAC) Versus FAC Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel As Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk, Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Results From the GEICAM/2003-02 Study.” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, 2002, pp. 2593–2599.
    8. Constantinidou, Anastasia et al. “Clinical Validation of EndoPredict in Pre-Menopausal Women with ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer.” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 28, no. 20, 2022, pp. 4435–4443.
    9. Simon, Richard et al. “Use Of Archived Specimens In Evaluation Of Prognostic And Predictive Biomarkers.” Journal Of The National Cancer Institute, vol 101, n. 21, 2009, pp. 1446–1452
    10. Penault-Llorca, Frederique et al. “Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients screened for UNIRAD, a UCBG randomized, double blind, phase III international trial evaluating the addition of *** (EVE) to adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in women with high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer (eBC)“. SABCS 2021, PD-09-08 Spotlight Poster Discussion 9
    11. Andre, Fabrice et al. “Biomarkers for Adjuvant Endocrine and Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 40, no. 16, 2022, pp. 1816–46.
    12. Cardoso, Fàtima et al. “Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.” Annals of Oncology, vol. 30, no. 8, 2019, pp. 1194–1220.
    13. Gradishar, William et al. “NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2021.” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 19, no. 5, 2021, p. 484.
    14. Thomssen, Christoph et al. “St. Gallen/Vienna 2021: A Brief Summary of the Consensus Discussion on Customizing Therapies for Women with Early Breast Cancer.” Breast Care, vol. 16, 2021, pp. 135–143.